<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad review day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foundationphp.com/blog/2006/03/08/bad-review-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foundationphp.com/blog/2006/03/08/bad-review-day/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:06:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://foundationphp.com/blog/2006/03/08/bad-review-day/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 03:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foundationphp.com/blog/2006/03/08/bad-review-day/#comment-191</guid>
		<description>David,

I am just learing PHP and have bought the PHP Dreamweaver 8 book.  I like it but as a beginner I unfortunately needed help in chapter 3 setting up a server.  I am testing remotely and just getting the server setup correct is causing me pain.  Do you think you can  include a simple screenshot local info, of the remote server settings and the remote testing server for your a sample remote testing config.   

Here is an example of my setup...

Local Site:

(all information to a local folder for files and an image folder except:

HTTP address: http://example.com/

Here is my setup: 

www.example.com </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>I am just learing PHP and have bought the PHP Dreamweaver 8 book.  I like it but as a beginner I unfortunately needed help in chapter 3 setting up a server.  I am testing remotely and just getting the server setup correct is causing me pain.  Do you think you can  include a simple screenshot local info, of the remote server settings and the remote testing server for your a sample remote testing config.   </p>
<p>Here is an example of my setup&#8230;</p>
<p>Local Site:</p>
<p>(all information to a local folder for files and an image folder except:</p>
<p>HTTP address: <a href="http://example.com/" rel="nofollow">http://example.com/</a></p>
<p>Here is my setup: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.example.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.example.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conspirisi</title>
		<link>http://foundationphp.com/blog/2006/03/08/bad-review-day/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>conspirisi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 14:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foundationphp.com/blog/2006/03/08/bad-review-day/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>no I mean why use 5 form fields when 1 or 2 get the principle across. I&#039;m a big fan of explanation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no I mean why use 5 form fields when 1 or 2 get the principle across. I&#8217;m a big fan of explanation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://foundationphp.com/blog/2006/03/08/bad-review-day/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 14:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foundationphp.com/blog/2006/03/08/bad-review-day/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I agree that shorter examples are needed. But if your definition of concise means cutting out some steps or explanation, we&#039;ll have to agree to differ. The target readership for the Foundation series is the beginner/intermediate level. Even if some steps seem obvious to you, they&#039;re vital for less experienced readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that shorter examples are needed. But if your definition of concise means cutting out some steps or explanation, we&#8217;ll have to agree to differ. The target readership for the Foundation series is the beginner/intermediate level. Even if some steps seem obvious to you, they&#8217;re vital for less experienced readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conspirisi</title>
		<link>http://foundationphp.com/blog/2006/03/08/bad-review-day/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>conspirisi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 13:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foundationphp.com/blog/2006/03/08/bad-review-day/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>ok I concede.... grudgingly.

I stick by making the examples (admittedly still on the first one) far more concise though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok I concede&#8230;. grudgingly.</p>
<p>I stick by making the examples (admittedly still on the first one) far more concise though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://foundationphp.com/blog/2006/03/08/bad-review-day/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 11:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foundationphp.com/blog/2006/03/08/bad-review-day/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments, conspirisi. Working out what the average reader will want from a book is extremely difficult. If you look at some of the reviews of &lt;em&gt;Foundation PHP 5 for Flash&lt;/em&gt; on Amazon, you&#039;ll see that some readers were disappointed that I didn&#039;t concentrate more on ActionScript. So, if I write a new version to please them, I&#039;ll please you even less. :(

The original concept of the book was to teach PHP to Flash developers. The original version of &lt;em&gt;Foundation PHP for Flash&lt;/em&gt; had been very popular, but was hopelessly out of date. Although I hadn&#039;t been involved with the first edition, foED said they wanted me to write it. That meant I had to take a completely fresh approach. The original used HTML forms, but my editor said he wanted me to use Flash forms instead. If I had used HTML forms for the PHP, the book would have been much shorter. On the other hand, a lot of readers seem to use the book to learn as much about ActionScript as PHP. Many of the questions I&#039;m asked have nothing to do with PHP, but are about using version 2 components.

As for validation, I disagree that it could be relegated to an appendix. Validation is extremely important in PHP. The fact that Flash enables you to do it reliably on the client side reduces the amount of PHP scripting required.

Do we get learners help us to write books? Not directly, although Sham Bhangal knew virtually nothing about PHP when he started working on the book as my technical reviewer. So he was a learner in that sense. I regularly monitor online forums to see what sort of problems are being asked about; and I use direct feedback about my books to improve future versions. foED want me to write a new version of &lt;em&gt;Foundation PHP 5 for Flash&lt;/em&gt;, but I&#039;m currently up to my eyeballs in a completely different book - all PHP, no Flash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments, conspirisi. Working out what the average reader will want from a book is extremely difficult. If you look at some of the reviews of <em>Foundation PHP 5 for Flash</em> on Amazon, you&#8217;ll see that some readers were disappointed that I didn&#8217;t concentrate more on ActionScript. So, if I write a new version to please them, I&#8217;ll please you even less. <img src='http://foundationphp.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The original concept of the book was to teach PHP to Flash developers. The original version of <em>Foundation PHP for Flash</em> had been very popular, but was hopelessly out of date. Although I hadn&#8217;t been involved with the first edition, foED said they wanted me to write it. That meant I had to take a completely fresh approach. The original used HTML forms, but my editor said he wanted me to use Flash forms instead. If I had used HTML forms for the PHP, the book would have been much shorter. On the other hand, a lot of readers seem to use the book to learn as much about ActionScript as PHP. Many of the questions I&#8217;m asked have nothing to do with PHP, but are about using version 2 components.</p>
<p>As for validation, I disagree that it could be relegated to an appendix. Validation is extremely important in PHP. The fact that Flash enables you to do it reliably on the client side reduces the amount of PHP scripting required.</p>
<p>Do we get learners help us to write books? Not directly, although Sham Bhangal knew virtually nothing about PHP when he started working on the book as my technical reviewer. So he was a learner in that sense. I regularly monitor online forums to see what sort of problems are being asked about; and I use direct feedback about my books to improve future versions. foED want me to write a new version of <em>Foundation PHP 5 for Flash</em>, but I&#8217;m currently up to my eyeballs in a completely different book &#8211; all PHP, no Flash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conspirisi</title>
		<link>http://foundationphp.com/blog/2006/03/08/bad-review-day/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>conspirisi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 10:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foundationphp.com/blog/2006/03/08/bad-review-day/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

I&#039;m not going to be to critical cus your helping me out on the forums right now :)

My opinion for what its worth:

The Idea for the book is great. I was really excited about the book, and still am if I can get through it. Its a natural progression for many clientside developers to eventually move into serverside scripting.

The problem is, I think it incorrectly reads its audience. 

1) I don&#039;t believe a purchaser of the book would be a beginner to actionscript as they would not be interested in, or really start off mixing actionscript with php. 

2) I do believe however that your audience will be, presumptuous as this is, be like me. Fairly experienced in client-side development - specifically Flash but not have a clue about server side scripting or hooking up to database.

3) This leaves another category - someone with serverside expertise and little clientside dev experience. Perhaps the book is more suited to them, I don&#039;t know i&#039;m not really amongst them.

Noting the above. Superfluous graphics or even too much scripting (not related to communicating with the server) on the flash side is just ignored by readers trying to get a grasp of php working with Flash. For example pgs 66 - 71 deals with putting a flash form together and validation. This whole section could be made more concise and even validation, important as it is, given that its clientside most readers of this book could accomplish. So that said probably best left out or the detailed in an appendix. The mail example is also evidence of misreading the audience, this may seem easy but to many flash developers who only really work clientside is a complete mystery. Judging from the forums this seems to be a sticking point and although you say its not the point of the excersise - its still really frustrating and affects the readers confidence. So that should be left till later in the book.

Hope I haven&#039;t been to critical as it was intended to be constructive. Also I anticipate to get much reward from the rest of the book as you know I&#039;m only on pg 77. 

I reckon Moock&#039;s approach is better model but perhaps leaving some of Moock&#039;s attention to detail (exemplified by EAS 2) out.

I must say though your contributions on the forums are hugely refreshing and inspires readers to continue.

I finish with a question, do authors actually use people who don&#039;t know what they are doing i.e.learners, to help them write books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to be to critical cus your helping me out on the forums right now <img src='http://foundationphp.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>My opinion for what its worth:</p>
<p>The Idea for the book is great. I was really excited about the book, and still am if I can get through it. Its a natural progression for many clientside developers to eventually move into serverside scripting.</p>
<p>The problem is, I think it incorrectly reads its audience. </p>
<p>1) I don&#8217;t believe a purchaser of the book would be a beginner to actionscript as they would not be interested in, or really start off mixing actionscript with php. </p>
<p>2) I do believe however that your audience will be, presumptuous as this is, be like me. Fairly experienced in client-side development &#8211; specifically Flash but not have a clue about server side scripting or hooking up to database.</p>
<p>3) This leaves another category &#8211; someone with serverside expertise and little clientside dev experience. Perhaps the book is more suited to them, I don&#8217;t know i&#8217;m not really amongst them.</p>
<p>Noting the above. Superfluous graphics or even too much scripting (not related to communicating with the server) on the flash side is just ignored by readers trying to get a grasp of php working with Flash. For example pgs 66 &#8211; 71 deals with putting a flash form together and validation. This whole section could be made more concise and even validation, important as it is, given that its clientside most readers of this book could accomplish. So that said probably best left out or the detailed in an appendix. The mail example is also evidence of misreading the audience, this may seem easy but to many flash developers who only really work clientside is a complete mystery. Judging from the forums this seems to be a sticking point and although you say its not the point of the excersise &#8211; its still really frustrating and affects the readers confidence. So that should be left till later in the book.</p>
<p>Hope I haven&#8217;t been to critical as it was intended to be constructive. Also I anticipate to get much reward from the rest of the book as you know I&#8217;m only on pg 77. </p>
<p>I reckon Moock&#8217;s approach is better model but perhaps leaving some of Moock&#8217;s attention to detail (exemplified by EAS 2) out.</p>
<p>I must say though your contributions on the forums are hugely refreshing and inspires readers to continue.</p>
<p>I finish with a question, do authors actually use people who don&#8217;t know what they are doing i.e.learners, to help them write books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anggie Bratadinata</title>
		<link>http://foundationphp.com/blog/2006/03/08/bad-review-day/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Anggie Bratadinata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foundationphp.com/blog/2006/03/08/bad-review-day/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Hi David, I just bought your book PHP 5 for Flash last month but I was so busy that I didn&#039;t have time to read it until last week and I&#039;m on Ch.3 now. I&#039;m a Flash designer in Indonesia, who do a few AS coding projects in the last 2 years. I have basic C++ and C# knowledge so I don&#039;t find your book to be difficult to follow. Actually, it is well written. The only thing that hold me from advancing so far is that you didn&#039;t provide a bird-view (or flowchart or DFD) of each application so I must go back and forth to draw it myself. Your clear explanations make it a lot easier. Anyway, your book is one of the best out there. It&#039;s a bit pricey for me, but I think it&#039;s worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David, I just bought your book PHP 5 for Flash last month but I was so busy that I didn&#8217;t have time to read it until last week and I&#8217;m on Ch.3 now. I&#8217;m a Flash designer in Indonesia, who do a few AS coding projects in the last 2 years. I have basic C++ and C# knowledge so I don&#8217;t find your book to be difficult to follow. Actually, it is well written. The only thing that hold me from advancing so far is that you didn&#8217;t provide a bird-view (or flowchart or DFD) of each application so I must go back and forth to draw it myself. Your clear explanations make it a lot easier. Anyway, your book is one of the best out there. It&#8217;s a bit pricey for me, but I think it&#8217;s worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

